( PDF ) Rev Osteoporos Metab Miner. 2010; 2 (4) suplemento: 10-4

Gómez de Tejada Romero MJ
Departamento de Medicina – Facultad de Ciencias de la Salud – Universidad de Sevilla (Spain)

 

Therapeutic compliance is of great importance if the demonstrable efficacy of drugs is to be reproduced in clinical practice. It has been sufficiently demonstrated that there is a lack of adherence in the pharmacological treatment of osteoporosis. The factors which influence this are highly diverse and complex, with some dependent on the treatment itself, whether in the drug (efficacy, secondary effects) or in its administration regime (frequency, mode of administration). The appearance of every day more efficacious drugs, with more spaced out administration periods and modes of administration which reduce undesirable secondary effects, diminish considerably the rate of abandonment of treatment for osteoporosis. However, these improved drugs should be complemented with an appropriate doctor-patient relationship, aimed at instructing and educating the latter and at maintaining their interest, to achieve a proper adherence to treatment, and thus, the maximum efficacy of the drugs.

Introduction. The size of the problem

The importance of osteoporosis lies in the fact that it predisposes the appearance of fractures, which means that it constitutes a major health problem1,2. The fractures most commonly associated with osteoporosis are vertebral, hip and the distal radius, or Colles, fractures3. It has been estimated that the risk of a patient with osteoporosis of suffering any fracture during the rest of their life varies between 40-50% in women and between 13% and 22% in men, and, in the specific case of hip fracture, the risk for a white woman is 17.5%, while for a man it is 6%1,2,4.
All these fractures have a high level of morbidity and result in a high social-health cost4,5: for example, approximately 25% of vertebral fractures and practically all fractures of the hip require hospitalisation2. But, in addition, osteoporotic fractures, especially of the hip, have a considerable mortality. Indeed, studies carried out in this country show that at the end of one year after a hip fracture approximately 30% of patients have died, increasing to 40% when the follow up is extended to two years6-10. Other studies have described a reduction in survival at 5 years of 15% after a hip fracture, observing that the greater part of the deaths occur in the first six months after it2.
Osteoporosis is a chronic process, usually asymptomatic, which deteriorates the bone, making it susceptible to fracture. The ultimate objective in the treatment of osteoporosis is to minimise the risk of suffering new fractures11-14. There is no drug which reduces this risk to zero: most of the drugs available nowadays for the treatment of osteoporosis obtain reductions of between 40% and 65%11-14, even when the medication is taken continuously during a period of time which varies between 3 and 5 years. These circumstances (lack of symptoms, necessity for prolonged treatment) means that, as happens with other similar diseases (arterial hypertension, hypercholesterolemia, diabetes mellitus), the abandonment by the patient of their medication is common, and for many diverse reasons. Institutions such as the World Health Organisation and the American Heart Association recognise that one of the main problems in the treatment of chronic diseases in developed countries is non-compliance on the part of patients in the correct taking of their medicines15,16.
With reference specifically to osteoporosis, multiple studies have demonstrated deficiencies in adherence to treatment by patients, and this has been studied with all drugs used: calcitonin, oestrogen therapy, raloxifen, teriparatide and biphosphonates17-22, and some have even compared the abandonment of osteoporosis treatment depending on which drug is being used. The existing works are highly varied, and often have contradictory results23-28. The disparity in the populations studied and the methodologies applied explain the difficulties in comparing results. However, all these studies agree on the fact that adherence to osteoporosis treatment is, in general, low, and that in the first year the percentage abandonment is found to be between 30% and 50% in most cases.

The success of treatment for osteoporosis depends to a great extent on adherence

It is evident that those patients who take their medicine for osteoporosis regularly have better results, both in reference to changes in bone mineral density29, and, more importantly, in the reduction of the rate of fractures and a decrease in mortality30,31. A study carried out by Siris et al. in a broad population of postmenopausal women of over 45 years of age, for whom had been indicated a biphosphonate as a treatment for osteoporosis, showed that, after 2 years of follow up, those women who took the treatment correctly (43%) had a reduction of risk of fracture, both vertebral and non-vertebral, 21% higher than those patients who did not correctly follow the treatment32. Earlier, Caro et al. had obtained similar results, finding a reduction in the appearance of new fractures higher (16%) among those patients who were compliant, as opposed to those who were not. In this study the period of follow up was also 2 years, and the drugs evaluated were calcitonin, hormone replacement therapy and biphosphonates33. The same authors repeated the study, using a broader database, with a cohort of more than 38,000 women affected by osteoporosis, and obtained similar figures: poor adherence to treatment was associated with an increase in the risk of fracture of 17% after a follow up of 1.7 years34. These results are corroborated by those obtained in other studies35,37.
The appropriate adherence to treatment is not only beneficial for the health of the patients, but also results in improved cost-effectiveness for the drug therapy for osteoporosis38.

The importance of the frequency of administration in the adherence to treatment for osteoporosis

Poor adherence to treatment for osteoporosis is dependent on many factors39,40. We have already indicated at the start that low or zero symptomology of the disease, and its being chronic, are two of the most important. Other factors which have an influence on adherence are patient-dependent: age, state of health, socio-cultural position. Others are dependent on the medical action taken (motivation, follow up, carrying out of tests which identify the state of the disease). And finally, there are factors dependent on the type of drug used in the treatment: secondary effects, efficacy, mode and frequency of administration. Therefore, adherence is complex and difficult to quantify41. The modification of the factors which negatively influence treatment compliance is one of the objectives all professionals should have when antiosteoporotic therapy is prescribed.
Up until now, the main interest in improving adherence has been centred on drug-dependent factors. In general, the drug treatments for osteoporosis have few secondary effects, and only a few infrequent effects could be considered to be serious. On the other hand, over time ever more efficacious and powerful drugs have been developed, varying the modes of administration and lengthening the frequency of dosage, all intended, ultimately, to improve adherence42,43.

The biphosphonates and adherence in the treatment of osteoporosis

The biphosphonates constitute the group of drugs most used in the treatment of osteoporosis44,45, and are considered to be the first choice for the treatment of osteoporosis in our ambit46. The gastrointestinal secondary effects of the biphosphonates, the motive for abandonment of treatment in a high percentage of cases47, necessitated the finding of preparations whose administration was more spaced out, and whose mode of administration was different from oral: what were initially daily doses became weekly administration in the case of alendronate48 and risedronate49, and monthly oral administration became quarterly intravenous in the case of ibandronate50,51. The last biphosphonate to be marketed for the treatment of osteoporosis, zoledronate, is for annual, intravenous administration52, which ensures, at least, compliance and therapeutic efficacy over a year, which is very important in view of the high number of abandonments of treatment which happen over this period53-55.
So, all these changes in the administration regimes of the biphosphonates can improve adherence in the long term drug treatment of osteoporotic patients56,57. The beneficial results of this have been demonstrated in different studies. Penning van Best et al. used a database in the Netherlands of the dispensation of drugs over a year, and found that, of 2,124 women who started therapy with biphosphonates, 51.9% of those to whom the drugs were administered weekly continued treatment, but only 42% of those taking a daily dose continued treatment, with different types of biphosphonates used (etidronate, alendronate or risedronate)58. Cramer et al. studied 2,741 women in treatment with biphosphonates and observed that, at the end of a year, persistence was 44.2% in those who had taken the biphosphonates weekly, as against 31.7% among those who took them daily59.
In another study carried out in the United States, Ettinger et al. analysed the sale of prescriptions of alendronate and risedronate in more than 211,000 women. They found that, at the end of a year, 56.7% of those patients who had taken biphosphonates weekly continued to receive the drug, as against 39% of those who had taken it daily. However, the authors noted that more than 40% of patients did not continue with treatment with weekly biphosphonates, and suggested that formulations which allowed a more spaced out administration could improve therapeutic compliance60. Cramer et al. in a work carried out in a total of 15,640 women in the United Kingdom, France and the United States, found that after a year, the persistence of patients with biphosphonates was higher in those who received the medication weekly, compared to those who received it daily: 44% vs 32% respectively in the Untied States; 52% vs 40% in the United Kingdom; and 51% vs 44% in France; in all cases the value of p < 0.00161.
In the study known as PERSIST, adherence to treatment at 6 months in a group of women who received ibandronate monthly was compared with another group which took alendronate weekly, and it was found that 56.6% of those who took the monthly treatment continued with treatment as opposed to 38.6% of those who took alendronate weekly62. We have not found a study which compares the adherence to treatment between biphosphonates with an annual dose and those administered more frequently.
On the other hand, there are studies whose objective was to record the preferences of patients with osteoporosis in respect to the pharmacological preparations for their treatment, in which it was observed that, as a general rule, patients prefer a more spaced out administration of treatment63-65. A multicentric, randomised, double blind study carried out by McLung et al. to assess the safety and efficacy of a single intravenous dose of 5 mg of zoledronic acid vs 70 mg of alendronate taken orally, weekly, carried out in 225 women with postmenopausal osteoporosis who had previously received weekly treatment with alendronate, found that 78.7% of patients expressed their preference for an annual intravenous treatment as opposed to a weekly oral treatment66, equal to that stated by the majority of patients participating in a similar study carried out by Saag et al.67.
However, although a higher adherence to treatment is seen with doses at longer intervals, it is notable that almost all the studies also conclude that the percentage of patients receiving the correct medication is sub-optimal, and this is the case whatever the mode of administration. This indicates that, as we have suggested earlier, therapeutic compliance in osteoporosis is complex, and dependent on diverse factors not only related to the drug, but also to the patient and their surroundings, as well as to the medical action taken. A review by Cochrane, Hayes et al.68 indicates that patients take approximately half the medication prescribed. Analysing a series of interventions taken to increase adherence to treatment, they found that those that were sure to be efficacious in the long term were complex to implement. Included amongst these interventions were provision of detailed information, self-monitoring by patients, advice, telephone reminders, family support and psychological treatment. But they concluded that, taken as a whole, the results were rather poor, recommending that new studies dealing with the improvement of adherence to treatment be carried out.
In view of these results, it is evident that the inclusion in the therapeutic arsenal for osteoporosis of more powerful drugs, which can be administered at greater intervals of time and in ways which cause fewer secondary effects, increase considerably adherence to treatment. But we should not forget that in conjunction with these improved drugs we should address other adherence factors related to the patients themselves, as well as proceeding with medical/health interventions which support and promote therapeutic compliance.

BIBLIOGRAPHY
1. Dennison E, Cooper C. Epidemiology of osteoporotic fractures. Horm Res 2000;54(Suppl 1):S58-S63.
2. Johnell O, Kanis J. Epidemiology of osteoporotic fractures. Osteoporos Int 2005;16(Suppl 2):S3-S7.
3. Dennison E, Mohamed MA, Cooper C. Epidemiology of osteoporosis. Rheum Dis Clin North Am 2006;32:617-29.
4. Cummings SR, Melton LJ III. Epidemiology and outcomes of osteoporotic fractures. Lancet 2002;359:1761-7.
5. Burge R, Dawson-Hughes B, Solomon DH, Wong JB, King A, Tosteson A. Incidence and economic burden of osteoporosis-related fractures in the United States, 2005-2025. J Bone Miner Res 2007;22:465-75.
6. Sosa M, Segarra MC, Hernández D, González A, Limiñana JM, Betancor P. Epidemiology of proximal femoral fracture in Gran Canaria (Canary Islands). Age Ageing 1993;22:285-8.
7. Sosa Henríquez M, Segarra Sánchez MC, Limiñana Cañal JM, Priego López M, Betancor León P. Fractura osteoporótica de la extremidad proximal del fémur. Relación con el hábitat y diferencias hospitalarias. Rev Esp Enf Metab Oseas 1993;2:26-9.
8. Sosa Henríquez M, Segarra Sánchez MC, Limiñana Cañal JM, Hernández Hernández D, González Pacheco A, Betancor León P. Morbilidad y mortalidad de la fractura osteoporótica de la extremidad proximal del fémur tras un año de seguimiento. Med Clin (Barc) 1993;101:481-3.
9. Díez A, Puig J, Martínez MT, Díez JL, Aubia J, Vivancos J. Epidemiology of fractures of the proximal femur associated with osteoporosis in Barcelona, Spain. Calcif Tissue Int 1989;44:382-6.
10. Sosa Henríquez M. La fractura osteoporótica de cadera en España. Rev Esp Enf Metab Oseas 1993;2:41-4.
11. Sambrook P, Cooper C. Osteoporosis. Lancet 2006; 367:2010-8.
12. Sosa Henríquez M, Hernández Hernández D. Tratamiento de la osteoporosis. En: Sosa Henríquez M, editor. Medicine. Número extraordinario: Osteoporosis. Madrid: Ed. Doyma; 2006.p.35-9.
13. Rosen CJ. Postmenopausal osteoporosis. N Engl J Med 2005;353:595-603.
14. Seeman E, Eisman JA. Treatment of osteoporosis: why, whom, when and how to treat. Med J Austral 2004;180:298-303.
15. World Health Organization. Adherence to Long-term Therapies: Evidence for Action. WHO/MNC/03.01 World Health Organization; 2003.
16. American Heart Association. 2003. Report available from: http://strokeconference.americanheart.org/includes/pdfs/Sessions WednesdayNewspaper.pdf (accessed on 17 May 2006).
17. Tosteson AN, Grove MR, Hammond CS, Moncur MM, Ray GT, Hebert GM, et al. Early discontinuation of treatment for osteoporosis. Am J Med 2003;115:209-16.
18. Carnevale V, Nieddu L, Romagnoli E, Bona E, Piemonte S, Scillitani A, et al. Osteoporosis intervention in ambulatory patients with previous hip fracture: a multicentric, nationwide Italian survey. Osteoporos Int 2006;17:478-83.
19. Curtis JR, Westfall AO, Allison JJ, Freeman A, Saag KG. Channeling and adherence with alendronate and risedronate among glucocorticoid users. Osteoporos Int 2006;17:1268-74.
20. Weycker D, Macarios D, Edelsberg J, Ester G. Compliance with drug therapy for postmenopausal osteoporosis. Osteoporos Int 2006:17:1645-52.
21. Papaioannou A, Ioannidis G, Adachi JD, Sebaldt RJ, Ferko N, Puglia M, et al. Adherence to bisphosphonates and hormona replacement therapy in a tertiary care setting of patients in the CANDOO database. Osteoporos Int 2003:14:808-13.
22. Foster SA, Foley KA, Meadows ES, Johnston JA, Wang SS, Pohl GM, et al. Adherence and persistence with teriparatide among patients with commercial, Medicare, and Medicaid insurance. Osteoporos Int 2010; Aug 27. [Epub ahead of print].
23. Turbí C, Herrero-Beaumont G, Acebes JC, Torrijos A, Graña J, Miguélez R, et al. Compliance and satisfaction with raloxifene versus alendronate for the treatment of postmenopausal osteoporosis in clinical practice: An open-label, prospective, nonrandomized, observational study. Clin Ther 2004;26:245-56.
24. Rossini M, Bianchi G, Di Munno O, Giannini S, Minisola S, Sinigaglia L, et al. Treatment of Osteoporosis in clinical Practice (TOP) Study Group. Determinants of adherence to osteoporosis treatment in clinical practice. Osteoporos Int 2006;17:914-21.
25. Papaioannou A, Kennedy CC, Dolovich L, Lau E, Adachi JD. Patient adherence to osteoporosis medications: problems, consequences and management strategies. Drugs Aging 2007;24:37-55.
26. McCombs JS, Thiebaud P, McLaughlin-Miley C, Shi J. Compliance with drug therapy for the treatment and prevention of osteoporosis. Maturitas 2004;48:271-8.
27. Pasion EG, Sivananthan SK, Kung AW, Chen SH, Chen YJ, Mirasol R, et al. Comparison of raloxifene and bisphosphonates based on adherence and treatment satisfaction in postmenopausal Asian women. J Bone Miner Metab 2007;25:105-13.
28. Ringe JD, Christodoulakos GE, Mellström D, Petto H, Nickelsen T, Marín F, et al. Patient compliance with alendronate, risedronate and raloxifene for the treatment of osteoporosis in postmenopausal women. Curr Med Res Opin 2007;23:2677-87.
29. Yood RA, Emani S, Reed JI, Edelman Lewis B, Charpentier M, Lydick E. Compliance with pharmacologic therapy for osteoporosis. Osteoporos Int 2003;14:965-8.
30. Patrick AR, Brookhart MA, Losina E, Schousboe JT, Cadarette SM, Mogun H, et al. The complex relation between bisphosphonate adherence and fracture reduction. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 2010;95:3251-9.
31. Lekkerkerker F, Kanis JA, Alsayed N, Bouvenot G, Burlet N, Cahall D, et al. Adherence to treatment of osteoporosis: a need for study. Osteoporos Int 2007;18:1311-7.
32. Siris ES, Harris ST, Rosen CJ, Barr CE, Arvesen JN, Abbott TA, et al. Adherence to bisphosphonate therapy and fracture rates in osteoporotic women: relationship to vertebral and nonvertebral fractures from 2 US claims databases. Mayo Clin Proc 2006;81:1013-22.
33. Caro JJ, Ishak KJ, Huybrechts KF, Raggio G, Naujoks C. The impact of compliance with osteoporosis therapy on fracture rates in actual practice. Osteoporos Int 2004;15:1003-8.
34. Huybrechts KF, Ishak KJ, Caro JJ. Assessment of compliance with osteoporosis treatment and its consequences in a managed care population. Bone 2006;38:922-8.
35. McCombs JS, Thiebaud P, McLaughlin-Miley C, Shi J. Compliance with drug therapies for the treatment and prevention of osteoporosis. Maturitas 2004;48:271-87.
36. Adachi J, Lynch N, Middelhoven H, Hunjan M, Cowell W. The association between compliance and persistence with bisphosphonate therapy and fracture risk: A review. BMC Musculoskelet Disord 2007;8:97. doi: 10.1186/1471-2474-8-97.
37. Van den Boogaard CHA, Breekveldt-Postman NS, Borggreve SE, Goettsch WG, Herings RMC. Persistent bisphosphonate use and the risk of osteoporotic fracture in clinical practice: a database analysis study. Curr Med Res Opin 2006;22:1757-64.
38. Hiligsmann M, Rabenda V, Gathon HJ, Ethgen O, Reginster JY. Potential clinical and economic impact of nonadherence with osteoporosis medications. Calcif Tissue Int 2010;83:202-10.
39. Zafran N, Liss Z, Peled R, Sherf, Reuveni H. Incidence and causes for failure of treatment of women with proven osteoporosis. Osteoporos Int 2005;16:1375-83.
40. Carr AJ, Thompson PW, Cooper. Factors associated with adherence and persistence to bisphosphonate therapy in osteoporosis: a cross-sectional survey. Osteoporos Int 2006;17:1638-44.
41. Lee S, Glendenning P, Inderjeeth CA. Efficacy, side effects and route of administration are more important than frequency of doping of anti-osteoporotic treatments in determining patient adherence: a critical review of published articles from 1970 to 2009. Osteoporos Int 2010; Jun 30. [Epub ahead of print].
42. Register JY. Adherence and persistence: impact on outcomes and health care resources. Bone 2006;38:18-21.
43. Martens MG, Shaw H. Maximizing effectiveness of bisphosphonate therapy for osteoporosis. South Med J 2008;101:824-30
44. Sosa Henríquez M, Filgueira Rubio J. López-Herce Cid JA. Díaz Curiel M, Lozano Tonkin C. del Castillo Rueda A, et al. ¿Qué opinan los internista españoles de la osteoporosis? Rev Clin Esp 2005;205:379-82.
45. Sociedad Española de Medicina Interna (SEMI). Protocolos. Osteoporosis. Madrid: Sociedad Española de Medicina Interna y Scientific Communication Management; 2004.
46. Sociedad Española de investigaciones óseas y metabolismo mineral (SEIOMM). Osteoporosis postmenopáusica. Guía de práctica clínica. Rev Clin Esp 2003;203:496-506.
47. M. Sosa Henríquez, E. Jódar Gimeno. Bifosfonatos: principios básicos, farmacocinética y tolerancia gastrointestinal. En: J. Calaf i Alsina, editor. Bifosfonatos y osteoporosis postmenopáusica. Barcelona: Ed. Scientific Comunication Management SL; 2003;p.113-121.
48. Schnitzer T, Bone HG, Crepaldi G, Adami S, McClung M, Kiel D, et al. Therapeutic equivalence of alendronate 70 mg once-weekly and alendronate 10 mg daily in the treatment of osteoporosis. Alendronate Once-Weekly Study Group. Aging (Milano) 2000;12:1-12.
49. Ilter E, Karalok H, Tufekci EC, Batur O. Efficacy and acceptability of risedronate 5 mg daily compared with 35 mg once weekly for the treatment of postmenopausal osteoporosis. Climacteric 2006;9:129-34.
50. Reginster JY, Adami S, Lakatos P, Greenwald M, Stepan JJ, Silverman SL et al. Efficacy and tolerability of once-monthly oral ibandronate in postmenopausal osteoporosis: 2 year results from the MOBILE study. Ann Rheum Dis 2006;65:654-61.
51. Eisman JA, Civitelli R, Adami S, Czerwinski E, Recknor C, Prince R, et al. Efficacy and tolerability of intravenous ibandronate injections in postmenopausal osteoporosis: 2-years results from DIVA study. J Rheum 2008;35:488-97.
52. Black DM, Delmas PD, Eastell R, Reid IR, Boonen S, Cauley JA, et al. Once-yearly zoledronic acid for treatment of postmenopausal osteoporosis. N Engl J Med 2007;356:1809-22.
53. Lewiecki EM. Intravenous zoledronic acid for the treatment of osteoporosis. Curr Osteoporos Rep 2008;6:17-23.
54. Maricic M. The role of zoledronic acid in the manegement of osteoporosis. Clin Rheumatol 2010;29:1079-84.
55. Ringe JD. Development of clinical utility of zoledronic acid and patient considerations in the treatment of osteoporosis. Patient Prefer Adherence 2010;4:231-45.
56. Boonen S, Vandershueren D, Venken K, Milisen K, Delforge M, Haentjens P. Recent developments in the manegement of postmenopausal osteoporosis with bisphosphonates: enhanced efficacy by enhanced compliance. J Intern Med 2008;264:315-32.
57. Cosman F. Treatment of osteoporosis and prevention of new fractures: role of intravenously administered bisphosphonates. Endocr Pract 2009;15:483-93.
58. Penning-van Beest FJ, Goettsch WG, Erkens JA, Herings RM. Determinants of persistence with bisphosphonates: a study in women with postmenopausal osteoporosis. Clin Ther 2006;28:236-42.
59. Cramer JA, Amonkar MM, Hebborn A, Altman R. Compliance and persistence with bisphosphonate dosing regimens among women with postmenopausal osteoporosis. Curr Med Res Opin 2005;21:1453-60.
60. Ettinger MP, Gallagher R, MacCosbe PE. Medication persistence with weekly versus daily doses of orally administered bisphosphonates. Endocr Pract 2006;12:522-8.
61. Cramer JA, Lynch NO, Gaudin AF, Walker M, Cowell W. The effect of dosing frequency on compliance and persistence with bisphosphonate therapy in postmenopausal women: a comparison of studies in the United States, the United Kingdom, and France. Clin Ther 2006;28:1686-94.
62. Cooper A, Drake J, Brankin E; the PERSIST Investigators. Treatment persistence with once-monthly ibandronate and patient support vs. once-weekly alendronate: results from the PERSIST study. Int J Clin Pract 2006;60:896-905.
63. Fraenkel L, Gulanski B, Wittink D. Patient treatment preferances for osteoporosis. Arthritis Rheum 2006;55:729-35.
64. Emkey R, Koltun W, Beusterien K, Seidman L, Kivitz A, Devas V, et al. Patient preference for once-monthly ibandronate versus once-weekly alendronate in a randomized, open-label, cross-over trial: the Boniva Alendronate Trial in Osteoporosis (BALTO). Curr Med Res Opin 2005;21:1895-903.
65. Payer J, Killinger Z, Sulková I, Celec P. Preferences of patients receiving bisphosphonates – How to influence the therapeutic adherence. Biomed Pharmacother 2007 Aug 9; [Epub ahead of print].
66. McClung M, Recker R, Miller P, Fiske D, Minkoff J, Kriegman A, et al. Intravenous zoledronic acid 5 mg in the treatment of postmenopausal women with low bone density previously treated with alendronate. Bone 2007;41:122-8.
67. Saag K, Lindsay R, Kriegman A, Beamer E, Zhou W. A single zoledronic acid infusion reduces bone resorption markers more rapidly than weekly oral alendronate in postmenopausal women with low bone mineral density. Bone 2007;40:1238-43.
68. Haynes RB, Yao X, Degani A, Kripalani S, Garg A, McDonald HP. Interventions to enhance medication adherence. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2005;4:CD000011.