Rev Osteoporos Metab Miner. 2010; 2 (2): 47-54
2 Servicio de Endocrinología – Hospital General de Ciudad Real
3 Unidad de Metabolismo óseo – Servicio de Endocrinología – Hospital Universitario San Cecilio – Granada
In recent years various epidemiological studies have shown an independent association of age between type 2 diabetes and osteoporosis, as well as an increase in cardiovascular mortality in patients with a reduction in BMD and/or osteoporotic fracture. The most recent research has focussed on factors involved in the physiopathology of the two diseases. In general, the studies which have investigated the relationship between cardiovascular risk factors, bone metabolism, bone mass and risk of fracture have shown inconclusive and contradictory results. In patients with DM2 there is an increase in risk of fractures in spite of a higher BMD, caused essentially by an increased risk of falls associated with the presence of vascular complications, although changes in bone quality are also a determining factor. Knowledge of the physiopathological mechanisms common to these pathologies will not only help better management of patients, but also could contribute to the development of drugs which would act on the two processes.
BMD: bone mineral density; TC: total cholesterol; HDL-C: high density lipoprotein cholesterol; LDL-C: low density lipoprotein cholesterol; TG triglycerides; BMI: body mass index; AHT: arterial hypertension; DM2: diabetes mellitus type 2; PTH: parathormone; NO: nitric oxide; MGP: matrix Gla protein; OPN: osteopontine; IMT: carotid intimal-medial thickness; OPG: osteoprotegerin; CVD: cardiovascular disease; SD: standard deviation; OR: odds ratio; HbA1c: glycosylated haemoglobin; GIP: gastric inhibitory polypeptide ; GLP-1: glucagon-like peptide-1.
Diabetes mellitus type 2 and osteoporosis are two entities with significant socio-health repercussions at a global level, derived essentially from the appearance of cardiovascular disease in the former, and fragility fractures in the latter. Although traditionally both diseases, and their associated complications, have been considered to be independent processes, in recent years a great deal of interest has been sparked in the study of common factors and mechanisms between the two.
1. Cardiovascular disease and osteoporosis
In recent years various epidemiological studies have shown an association independent of age between the two processes1, and an increase in cardiovascular mortality in patients with a reduction in BMD and/or osteoporotic fracture. Although for some time it has been known that the two diseases share risk factors which could justify their association, such as age, oestrogenic depletion, sedentariness , consumption of alcohol and tobacco, and dietary factors2, the most recent research has centred on those aspects implicated in the physiopathology of both diseases.
1.1. Cardiovascular risk factors
Studies which have investigated the relationship between cardiovascular risk factors, bone metabolism, bone mass and risk of fracture, have shown inconclusive and contradictory results in most cases.
In in vitro studies, HDL-C appears to show an inhibitory effect on osteoblast activity induced by inflammatory cytokines in the vascular wall3, and raised concentrations of oxidised LDL-C has an apoptotic effect on osteoblastic cells4, inhibiting their differentiation and promoting osteoclastic activity5. Most of the studies carried out have not found a relationship between LDL-C and BMD, although in a recent study the values of TC and LDL-C showed a positive correlation with hip and lumbar BMD in males6. In addition, high values of TG after adjusting for BMI have been positively associated with BMD7. In terms of the association between lipids and vertebral fractures, the results of the studies differ as a function of sex. Thus, in postmenopausal women with vertebral fracture the levels of TC, LDL-C and TGs were lower than in those women without fracture8, although in other cases no association has been demonstrated9. Studies carried out in males have not shown an association between lipids and vertebral fracture6,9. In the study carried out by Hernandez et al. in a Spanish cohort of males, levels of LDL-C and TC were lower in those subjects with non-vertebral fractures. The discrepancy between studies could reflect the influence of genetic, dietary or geographic factors on this association.
In AHT, a higher rate of bone loss in relation to an increase in the excretion of calcium in the urine has been described, which raises the levels of PTH10. A positive relationship has been proposed between BMD and the presence of AHT11,12, while other authors describe a negative or independent association13. In respect of fractures, the data are more consistent, and we know that AHT is a risk factor for hip fractures in women14, and for other locations in both sexes15, with one of the possible pathogenic factors being the increased risk of falls caused to a great extent by the hypotensive effect of the antihypertensive drugs. Other authors have described, as a class effect of hypotensive drugs, a discrete reduction in the global risk of fractures which could be related to a reduction in the urinary excretion of calcium15.
The influence of different hypotensive treatments on BMD and other related factors has also been evaluated. Thus, in postmenopausal women with AHT in treatment with tiazides, the levels of markers for remodelling were lower with respect to the control group, and the lumbar BMD, higher12.
The pathogenic mechanisms responsible for the relationship between fat and bone are multiple: gastrointestinal peptides such as GLP-1 and GIP, levels of insulin in circulation and adipokynes. On many occasions this relationship is complex and discordant results have been found. Leptin, the adipokyne increased in obesity, in the hypothalamus slows the formation of bone by inhibiting the proliferation of the osteoblasts16, whilst in the bone it stimulates osteoblastic, and inhibits osteoclastic, differentiation17. The results of clinical trials are also contradictory, finding a positive relationship between blood levels of leptin and BMD in women18, and negative in males19. On the other hand, adiponectin halts osteoclastogenesis in in vitro studies20, and in DM2 its blood levels are negatively related to BMD21.
Different studies have shown a positive relationship between body weight and BMD. This relationship is greater in women, both postmenopausal and sedentary22. Similarly, a recent meta-analysis shows a protective effect of obesity on the global risk of fracture23. Analysing the different types of fracture, this protective effect is shown on hip and vertebral fractures24, but not in distal radius fracture25.
Hyperhomocysteinemia is a marker for cardiovascular risk which has been associated with a higher rate of bone resorption26, and a higher risk of fractures27. However, active therapy to control its blood levels was not able to reduce the incidence of fractures28.
One of the fundamental components of metabolic syndrome is hyperinsulinemia and insulin resistance. Insulin has been demonstrated to stimulate the proliferation of osteoblasts and the secretion of other factors implicated in bone formation, such as BMPs and IGF-1, from which one would expect a higher BMD in these patients. Thus, in patients with metabolic syndrome a higher BMD in the hip has been described29. The presence of metabolic syndrome has also been related to a lower risk of non-vertebral fractures, both in men and women in a transversal study30, while in a prospective study incidental clinical fractures were 2.6 times more frequent in those patients with metabolic syndrome compared with the controls31. In patients with DM2, the added presence of other components of metabolic syndromes was associated with a lower prevalence of vertebral fracture32.
1.2. Factors involved in bone metabolism and cardiovascular disease
The protective effect of oestrogens on the vascular system of postmenopausal women, and the increase in vascular disease after menopause suggests a role for oestrogenic depletion in the development of atherosclerosis in women. In relation to this fact, it has been observed that the gene for the alpha oestrogenic receptor is associated with a higher risk of cerebrovascular disease33, and in turn, certain polymorphisms of the beta receptor appear to be a risk factor for acute myocardial infarction in Spanish males34.
The relationship between vitamin D and vascular disease has been studied in depth, with contradictory results. In experimental animals high concentrations of vitamin D in the diet favoured the development of coronary and aortic arteriosclerosis35. In humans, various studies have found an association of risk between certain variants of the vitamin D receptor gene and the presence of coronary disease36, while others show no such association37. An epidemiological study in the US showed that supplementing foods with vitamin D increased the incidence of arteriosclerotic disease. However, other works have put the relationship the other way round, and have associated the deficit in vitamin D with the presence of peripheral arterial disease38 and myocardial infarction39, thus, as an inverse relationship between 1-25 dihydroxyvitamin D and the degree of coronary calcification40.
Receptors for PTH have been confirmed in cardiac and smooth muscle cells, attributing to them a trophic effect and suggesting that it could be responsible for the hypertrophy of the left ventricle observed in patients in dialysis. On the other hand, in mice with acute myocardial infarction treatment with PTH favours the migration of angiogenic progenitor cells to the damaged area, which could attenuate the ischemic damage41, and recently it has also been found that PTH increases the endothelial expression of NO42.
Parameters of remodelling
A deficit in MGP encourages the presence and the extent of vascular calcification in experimental animals and specific polymorphisms are associated with a high risk of myocardial infarction in humans43, which suggests that it has a role in the inhibition of vascular calcification44. In turn, osteocalcin is expressed in the vascular tissue and its blood levels have been related with parameters for arteriosclerosis in patients with DM245. Osteopontin (OPN) is expressed in calcified atheromatous lesions, and mice with high levels of OPN have a higher IMT47. The type 2 bone morphogenetic protein and its osteogenic mediator CbFa-1 (core-binding factor α 1) are increased in human arteriosclerotic lesions, but not in healthy vessels47. Catepsin K, the main enzyme involved in bone resorption, could be involved in the destabilisation of the plaque, since it has been observed that in ApoE knockout mice the catepsin K deficit preserves arterial stability and integrity, and diminishes vulnerability to artherosclerotic plaques48.
OPG is expressed in the smooth muscle cells and in the endothelial cells of the arterial wall where they appear to be an autocrine survival factor of the endothelial cells49. The increase in the levels of OPG in blood have been associated with the presence and severity of arterial calcification in various locations and in different pathologies: renal insufficiency in haemodialysis50, coronary calcification in rheumatoid arthritis51 and abdominal aortic calcification in peripheral arthropathy52. If the raise blood levels of OPG is simply a marker for vascular damage, represents a defence mechanism or, on the contrary, is an active mediator for the progression of the disease, remains to be clarified.
The predictive value of blood levels of OPG in the incidence and mortality of CVD has been confirmed in different populations studied. Thus, it has been shown that the increase in blood levels of OPG is a risk factor for cardiovascular morbimortality in conditions of accelerated atherosclerosis such as in women of advance age53, haemodialysed patients54, and diabetes type 155, but also in the general population56. Raised blood levels of OPG are associated with the presence and severity of coronary disease57, and with the severity of peripheral arthropathy58. OPG has also been related to surrogate markers for sub-clinical arteriosclerotic disease. In postmenopausal women without CVD high levels of OPG are positively related to endothelial dysfunction, arterial rigidity and ITM59.
1.3. Surrogate markers for CVD and
The majority of transversal studies carried out have described an inverse association between the presence, severity and progression of arterial calcification and BMD, both in menopausal women60,61, and in males62, as well as an increased risk of fracture in postmenopausal women with aortic calcification63. Carotid atheromatosis, another surrogate marker for CVD, is associated with a lower lumbar bone mass in postmenopausal women64, and a higher risk of fracture65. The presence of osteoporosis and/or fracture have also been related to an increased risk of sub-clinical arteriosclerotic disease66.
1.4. Cardiovascular events and osteoporosis
In osteoporotic women or those with vertebral fracture there has been described a relative risk of 3.9 and 3 respectively, of cardiovascular events, this risk being proportional to the severity of the osteoporosis at diagnosis67. In the same way, the lumbar BMD is reduced in patients with cardiovascular disease independently of age68, and the presence of peripheral arterial disease and/or ischemic cardiopathy is associated with a higher risk of hip fracture69. There has also been a significant association found between the presence of myocardial infarction and low bone mass70, and between the presence of osteoporosis/osteopenia and an increased risk of obstructive coronary disease in both sexes71. On the other hand, a decrease of 1 SD in the BMD in the calcaneum and femoral neck increases the risk of cerebrovascular disease by 1.3 and 1.9 respectively72.
2. Diabetes mellitus type 2, osteoporosis and risk of fracture
2.1. Diabetes and bone mass
The deleterious effect of DM on the bone varies as a function of the type of diabetes. In patients with DM2, although the results are odd, there appears to be an increase in the risk of fractures despite a higher BMD, caused fundamentally by an increased risk of falls associated with the presence of vascular complications, as well as alterations in bone quality, which are also a determining factor73.
Studies which have assessed BMD in patients with DM2 show discordant results. In the lumbar region, positive74, negative75, and neutral76 effects have been described. In the hip, the results are somewhat more uniform, with a higher BMD for both sexes being observed in the majority77, and in the distal third of the radius, negative76, or neutral78 effects have been described. The result in the studies indicated above mostly confirm that the main determinants of BMD in patients with DM2 are age and BMI. Although not all, some of these studies have found a negative relation between the degree of metabolic control76 and the duration of the disease71. In the Spanish population with DM2 exercise, BMI and the adequate consumption of calcium appear to be factors protective of osteoporosis, on the other hand, age, and the consumption of zinc are risk factors79,80.
2.2. Risk of fractures in patients with DM2
Most of the studies show an increase in risk of fracture in spite of a higher BMD. Thus, an incidence of fractures in patients with DM2 has been described which is similar to the control group despite a higher BMD81. And an increase in the risk of non-vertebral fractures of 69% for both sexes in the diabetic population74. The fact that in this study the increase in risk is circumscribed in those patients with DM2 in treatment, and that they suffered a higher percentage of falls, makes one think that the higher risk of fracture in these patients is due to a higher rate of falls. In fact it has been corroborated that the risk of falls is increased only in those patients treated with insulin (OR 2.76) and that the principal risk factors for this increase are age, alterations in balance, diabetic neuropathy and retinopathy, and coronary disease82. Another risk factor for falls in this group of patients is the high prevalence of hypovitaminosis D which they suffer83. A recent review has demonstrated a global increase in the risk of any fracture of 30%, and 70% for hip fractures84. The results were consistent in Europe and the US, and there was a relationship with the follow up, since those with disease of more than 10 years standing had an even higher risk of hip fracture. On the other hand, no increased risk of vertebral, proximal humeral or in the distal third of the radius was found, although there was a 30% increase in risk for the bones of the feet. Against these results, a retrospective cohort study did find an increased risk of vertebral and proximal humeral fracture, the main risk factors being age, previous fracture, neuropathy and treatment with insulin, with exercise, BMI and the use of biguanides being protective factors85. The same as with BMD, the majority of the studies did not observe an association between the degree of metabolic control, determined by HbA1c, and the risk of fracture, save for one Japanese study where the presence of HbA1c > 9% was associated with an increase in the risk of vertebral fractures21. On the other hand, blood levels of pentosidine (a product of non-enzymatic glycation) is an independent risk factor for vertebral fracture in both women and men with DM282. In Spain, the GIUMO study carried out in postmenopausal women with obesity and DM2 did not observe an increased prevalence in vertebral or hip fractures, nor in conjunction with non-vertebral fractures86. Finally, a biphasic effect has been proposed regarding the risk of having a hip fracture, since patients with hydrocarbonate intolerance, or with a recent diagnosis of DM2, have shown a lower risk of fractures74,87, while those with disease of longer duration have an increased risk85,87. On the basis of this theory, initially overweight and obesity will play a protective role, while subsequently the development of complications due to diabetes will raise the risk of fracture.
2.3. Potential pathogenic mechanisms of osteoporosis in DM2
Hyperglycemia has direct adverse effects on bone metabolism in both types of DM (Figure 1). In being the principal source of energy for the osteoclasts, it increases, dose-dependently, their activity in vitro88. On the other hand, non-enzymatic glycosylation of various bone proteins, including collagen type 1, alters and reduces bone quality89. Thus, in animal models of diabetes, the content of pentosidine in bone increases during the course of the disease, reducing the biomechanical properties of the bone, in spite of maintaining a stable BMD90. The increase in glycemia also has indirect effects on the skeleton since it favours hypercalciuria and interferes with the PTH/vitamin D system. On the other hand, the improvement in glycemic control in poorly controlled DM2 reduces the urinary excretion of calcium and phosphorus91. In addition, in recent years, interest has grown in research into the effect of the incretins on bone metabolism. It has been suggested that GIP and GLP-2 could be responsible for the inhibition of bone resorption after the ingestion of food, and it has been observed that those patients with DM2 have a reduction in this effect after an oral overload of glucose92. A Spanish study, carried out in diabetic rats has found that GLP-1 has an anabolic effect on bone, independently of insulin93. However, if the alterations in the incretin system present in DM2 are responsible for the changes in BMD in this group of patients, it is still to be elucidated.
Atherosclerosis and osteoporosis are chronic degenerative diseases with a high incidence in developed countries and whose prevalence increases with age. Both are silent processes with a high economic cost, especially when there are acute complications which include cardiovascular disease and fractures. The OPG/RANKL system has been suggested as a common mediator for both processes, but its precise significance is unknown. Knowledge of the common physiopathological mechanisms of these two pathologies will not only help in better management of patients but it could also contribute to the development of active drugs for both processes. Research into type 2 diabetes may bring important data regarding this complex association.
1. Hofbauer LC, Brueck CC, Shanahan CM, Schoppet M, Dobnig H. Vascular calcification and osteoporosis: from clinical observation towards molecular understanding. Osteoporos Int 2007;18:251-9.
2. Valero Díaz de la Madrid C, González Macías J. Osteoporosis y Arterioesclerosis. Rev Esp Enf Metab 2004;13:34-45.
3. Parhami F, Basseri B, Hwang J, Tintut Y, Demer LL. High-density lipoprotein regulates calcification of vascular cells. Circ Res 2002;91:570-6.
4. Yamaguchi T, Sugimoto T, Yano S, Yamauchi M, Sowa H, Chen Q, et al. Plasma lipids and osteoporosis in postmenopausal women. Endocr J 2002;49:211-7.
5. Parhami F, Garfinkel A, Demer LL. Role of lipids in osteoporosis. Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol 2000;20:2346-8.
6. Hernández JL, Olmos JM, Ramos C, Martínez J, De Juan J, Valero C, et al. Serum lipids and bone metabolism in men: The Camargo Cohort Study. Endocr Journal 2010;57:51-60.
7. Adami S, Braga V, Zamboni M, Gatti D, Rossini M, Bakri J, et al. Relationship between lipids and bone mass in 2 cohorts of healthy women and men. Calcif Tissue Int 2004;74:136-42.
8. Yamaguchi T, Sugimoto T, Yano S, Yamauchi M, Sowa H, Chen Q, et al. Plasma lipids and osteoporosis in postmenopausal women. Endocr Journal 2002;49:211-7.
9. Sivas F, Alemdaroglu E, Elverici E, Lulug T, Ozoran K. Serum lipid profile: its relationship with osteoporotic vertebrae fractures and bone mineral density in Turkish postmenopausal women. Reumathol Int 2009;29:885-90.
10. Cirillo M, Strazzullo P, Galleti F, Siani A, Nunziata V. The effect of an intravenous calcium load on serum total and ionized calcium in normotensive and hypertensive subjects. J Clin Hypertens 1985;1:30-4.
11. Hanley DA, Brown JP, Tenenhouse A, Olszynski WP, Ioannidis G, Berger C. Associations among disease conditions, bone mineral density, and prevalent vertebral deformities in men and women 50 years of age and older: cross sectional results from the Canadian Multicentre Osteoporosis Study. J Bone Miner Res 2003;18:784-90.
12. Olmos JM, Hernández JL, Martínez J, Castillo J, Valero C, Pérez Pajares I, et al. Bone turover markers and bone mineral density in hypertensive postmenopausal women on treatment. Maturitas 2010;65:396-402.
13. Mussolino ME, Gillum RF. Bone mineral density and hypertension prevalence in postmenopausal women: results from the Third National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey. Ann Epidemiol 2006;16:395-9.
14. Pérez-Castrillón JL, Martín-Escudero JC, Álvarez Manzanares P, Cortes Sancho R, Iglesias Zamora S, García Alonso M. Hypertension as a risk factor for hip fracture. Am J Hypertens 2005;18:146-7.
15. Vestergaard P, Rejnmark L, Mosekilde L. Hypertension is a risk factor for fractures. Calcif Tissue Int 2009;84:103-11.
16. Takeda S. Central control of bone remodelling. J Neuroendocrinol 2008;20:802-7.
17. Holloway WR, Collier FM, Aitken CJ, Myers DE, Hodge JM, Malakellis M, et al. Leptin inhibits osteoclast generation. J Bone Miner Res 2002;17:200-9.
18. Yamauchi M, Sugimoto T, Yamaguchi T, Nakaoka D, Kanzawa M, Yano S, et al. Plasma leptin concentrations are associated with bone mineral density and the presence of vertebral fractures in postmenopausal women. Clin Endocrinol (Oxf) 2001;55:341-7.
19. Sato M, Takeda N, Sarui H, Takami R, Takami K, Hayashi M, et al. Association between serum leptin concentrations and bone mineral density, and biochemical markers of bone turnover in adult men. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 2001;86:S273-6.
20. Shinoda Y, Yamaguchi M, Ogata N, Akune T, Kubota N, Yamauchi T, et al. Regulation of bone formation by adiponectin through autocrine/paracrine and endocrine pathways. J Cell Biochem 2006;99:196-208.
21. Kanazawa I, Yamaguchi T, Yamamoto M, Yamauchi M, Yano S, Sugimoto T. Combination of obesity with hyperglycemia is a risk factor for the presence of vertebral fractures in type 2 diabetic men. Calcif Tissue Int 2008 83:324-31.
22. Reid IR. Relationship between fat and bone. Osteoporos Int 2008;19:595-606.
23. De Laet C, Kanis JA, Oden A, Johanson H, Johnell O, Delmas P, et al. Body mass index as a predictor of fracture risk: A meta-analysis. Osteoporos Int 2005;16:1330-8.
24. Johnell O, Oneill T, Felsenberg D, Kanis J, Cooper C, Silman AJ, et al. Anthropometric measurements and vertebral deformities. Am J Epidemiol 1997;146:287-93.
25. Vogt MT, Cauley JA, Tomaino MM, Stone K, Williams JR, Herndon JH. Distal radius fractures in older women: A 10-year follow-up study of descriptive characteristics and risk factors. The study of osteoporotic fractures. J Am Geriatr Soc 2002;50:97-103.
26. Koh JM, Lee YS, Kim YS, Kim DJ, Kim HH, Park JY, et al. Homocysteine enhances bone resorption by stimulation of osteoclast formation and activity through increased intracellular ROS generation. J Bone Miner Res 2006;21:1003-11.
27. Van Meurs JB, Dhonukshe-Rutten RA, Pluijm SM, van der Klift M, de Jonge R, Lindemans J, et al. Homocysteine levels and the risk of osteoporotic fracture. N Engl J Med 2004;350:2033-41.
28. Sawka AM, Ray JG, Yi Q, Josse RG, Lonn E. Randomized clinical trial of homocysteine level lowering therapy and fractures. Arch Intern Med 2007;167:2136-9.
29. Kinjo M, Setoguchi S, Solomon DH. Bone mineral density in adults with the metabolic syndrome: analysis in a population-based US sample. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 2007;92:4161-4.
30. Ahmed LA, Schirmer H, Berntsen GK, Fonnebo V, Joakimsen RM. Features of the metabolic syndrome and the risk of non-vertebral fractures: The Tromso study. Osteoporos Int 2006;17:426-32.
31. Von Muhlen D, Safii S, Jassal SK, Svatberg J, Barret-Connor E. Associations between the metabolic syndrome and bone health in older men and women: the Rancho Bernardo study. Osteoporos Int 2007;18:1337-44.
32. Yamaguchi T, Kanazawa I, Yamamoto M, Kurioka S, Yamauchi M, Yano S, et al. Associations between component of the metabolic syndrome versus bone mineral density and vertebral fractures in patients with type 2 diabetes. Bone 2009;45:174-9.
33. Lazaros L, Markoula S, Xita N, Giannopoulos S, Gogou P, Lagos G, et al. Association of estrogen receptor-alpha gene polymorphisms with stroke risk in patients with metabolic syndrome. Acta Neurol Scand 2008;117:186-90.
34. Domingues-Montanari S, Subirana I, Tomás M, Marrugat J, Sentí M. Association between ESR2 genetic variants and risk of myocardial infarction. Clin Chem 2008;54:1183-9.
35. Kunitomo M, Kinoshita K, Bandô Y. Experimental atherosclerosis in rats fed a vitamin D, cholesterol-rich diet. J Pharmacobiodyn 1981;4:718-23.
36. Ortlepp JR, Krantz C, Kimmel M, von Korff A, Vesper K, Schmitz F, et al. Additive effects of the chemokine receptor 2, vitamin D receptor, interleukin-6 polymorphisms and cardiovascular risk factors on the prevalence of myocardial infarction in patients below 65 years. Int J Cardiol 2005;20:105: 90-5.
37. Ortlepp JR, von Korff A, Hanrath P, Zerres K, Hoffmann R. Vitamin D receptor gene polymorphism BsmI is not associated with the prevalence and severity of CAD in a large-scale angiographic cohort of 3441 patients. Eur J Clin Invest 2003;33:106-9.
38. Fahrleitner A, Prender G, Leb G, Tscheliessnigg K.H, Pinswanger- Solkner C, Obermsyer-Pietsch B, et al. Serum osteoprotegerin levels is a major determinant of bone density development and prevalent vertebral fracture status following cardiac transplantation. Bone 2003;32:96-106.
39. Pérez-Castrillón JL, Vega G, Abad L, Sanz A, Chaves J, Hernández G, et al. Effects of Atorvastatin on vitamin D levels in patients with acute ischemic heart disease. Am J Cardiol 2007;99:903-5.
40. Watson KE, Abrolat ML, Malone LL, Hoeg JM, Doherty T, Detrano R. Demer Active sreum vitamin D levels are inversely correlated with coronary calcification. Circulation 1997;96:1755-60.
41. Zaruba MM, Huber BC, Brunner S, Deindl E, David R, Fischer R, et al. Parathyroid hormone treatment after myocardial infarction promotes cardiac repair by enhanced neovascularization and cell survival. Cardiovasc Res 2008;77:722-31.
42. Rashid G, Bernheim J, Green J, Benchetrit S. Parathyroid hormone stimulates the endothelial nitric oxide synthase through protein kinase A and C pathways. Nephrol Dial Transplant 2007;22:2831-7.
43. Herrmann SM, Whatling C, Brand E, Nicaud V, Gariepy J, Simon A, et al. Polymorphisms of the human matrix gla protein (MGP) gene, vascular calcification, and myocardial infarction. Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol 2000;20:2386-93.
44. Boström K. Insights into the mechanism of vascular calcification. Am J Cardiol 200;88(2A):20E-22E.
45. Kanazawa I, Yamaguchi T, Yamamoto M, Yamauchi M, Yano S, Sugimoto T. Combination of obesity with hyperglycemia is a risk factor for the presence of vertebral fractures in type 2 diabetic men. Calcif Tissue Int 2008;83:324-31.
46. Isoda K, Nishikawa K, Kamezawa Y, Yoshida M, Kusuhara M, Moroi M, et al. Osteopontin plays an important role in the development of medial thickening and neointimal formation. Circ Res 2002;9:77-82.
47. Engelse MA, Neele JM, Bronckers AL, Pannekoek H, de Vries CJ. Vascular calcification: expression patterns of the osteoblast-specific gene core binding factor alpha-1 and the protective factor matrix gla protein in human atherogenesis. Cardiovasc Res 2001;52:281-9.
48. Samokhin AO, Wong A, Saftig P, Brömme D. Role of cathepsin K in structural changes in brachiocephalic artery during progression of atherosclerosis in apoE-deficient mice. Atherosclerosis 2008;200:58-68.
49. Malyankar UM, Scatena M, Suchland KL, Yun TJ, Clark EA, Giachelli CM. Osteoprotegerin is an alpha vbeta 3-induced, NF-kappa B-dependent survival factor for endothelial cells. J Biol Chem 2000;275:20959-62.
50. Nitta K, Akiba T, Uchida K, Otsubo S, Takei T, Yumura W, et al. Serum osteoprotegerin levels and the extent of vascular calcification in haemodialysis patients. Nephrol Dial Transplant 2004;19:1886-9.
51. Asanuma Y, Chung CP, Oeser A, Solus JF, Avalos I, Gebretsadik T, et al. Serum Osteoprotegerin is increased and independently associated with coronary-artery atherosclerosis in patients with rheumatoid arthritis. Atherosclerosis 2007;195:135-41.
52. Clancy P, Oliver L, Jayalath R, Buttner P, Golledge J. Assessment of a serum assay for quantification of abdominal aortic calcification. Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol 2006;26:2574-6.
53. Browner WS, Lui LY, Cummings SR. Associations of serum osteoprotegerin levels with diabetes, stroke, bone density, fractures, and mortality in elderly women. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 2001;86:631-7.
54. Morena M, Terrier N, Jaussent I, Leray-Moragues H, Chalabi L, Rivory JP, et al. Plasma osteoprotegerin is associated with mortality in hemodialysis patients. J Am Soc Nephrol 2006;17:262-70.
55. Rasmussen LM, Tarnow L, Hansen TK, Parving HH, Flyvbjerg A. Plasma osteoprotegerin levels are associated with glycaemic status, systolic blood pressure, kidney function and cardiovascular morbidity in type 1 diabetic patients. Eur J Endocrinol 2006;154:75-81.
56. Kiechl S, Schett G, Wenning G, Redlich K, Oberhollenzer M, Mayr A, et al. Osteoprotegerin is a risk factor for progressive atherosclerosis and cardiovascular disease. Circulation 2004;109:2175-80.
57. Jono S, Ikari Y, Shioi A, Mori K, Miki T, Hara K, et al. Serum osteoprotegerin levels are associated with the presence and severity of coronary artery disease. Circulation 2002;106:1192-4.
58. Ziegler S, Kudlacek S, Luger A, Minar E. Osteoprotegerin plasma concentrations correlate with severity of peripheral artery disease. Atherosclerosis 2005;182:175-80.
59. Shargorodsky M, Boaz M, Luckish A, Matas Z, Gavish D, Mashavi M. Osteoprotegerin as an independent marker of subclinical atherosclerosis in osteoporotic postmenopausal women. Atherosclerosis 2009;204:60811.
60. Hak AE, Pols HA, van Hemert AM, Hofman A, Witteman JC. Progression of aortic calcification is associated with metacarpal bone loss during menopause: a population-based longitudinal study. Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol 2000;20:1926-32.
61. Kiel DP, Kauppila LI, Cupples LA, Hannan MT, O’Donnell CJ, Wilson PW. Bone loss and the progression of abdominal aortic calcification over a 25 year period: the Framingham Heart Study. Calcif Tissue Int 2001;68:271-6.
62. Hyder JA, Allison MA, Wong N, Papa A, Lang TF, Sirlin C, et al. Association of coronary artery and aortic calcium with lumbar bone density: the MESA Abdominal Aortic Calcium Study. Am J Epidemiol 2009;169:186-94.
63. Bagger YZ, Tankó LB, Alexandersen P, Qin G, Christiansen C, Prospective Epidemiological Risk Factors Study Group. Radiographic measure of aorta calcification is a site-specific predictor of bone loss and fracture risk at the hip. J Intern Med 2006;259:598-605.
64. Frost ML, Grella R, Millasseau SC, Jiang BY, Hampson G, Fogelman I, et al. Relationship of calcification of atherosclerotic plaque and arterial stiffness to bone mineral density and osteoprotegerin in postmenopausal women referred for osteoporosis screening. Calcif Tissue Int 2008;83:112-20.
65. Jørgensen L, Engstad T, Jacobsen BK. Bone mineral density in acute stroke patients: low bone mineral density may predict first stroke in women. 2001;32:47-51.
66. Kim SM, Lee J, Ryu OH, Lee KW,